Cronenberg Defends AI: Filmmaking Innovation or Industry Smear Campaign?
Published At: March 24, 2025, 7:28 a.m.

Cronenberg Defends AI's Role in Filmmaking Amid Controversy

During a recent discussion at the London Soundtrack Festival, celebrated director David Cronenberg passionately defended the use of artificial intelligence in modern filmmaking. Speaking with longtime collaborator Howard Shore, Cronenberg dismissed critics of The Brutalist by arguing that AI has long been a behind-the-scenes tool in the art of motion pictures.

A Smear Campaign Against Creativity?

Cronenberg suggested that the backlash against The Brutalist was less about the technology and more about personal and professional rivalries. He speculated that a deliberate campaign might be at work by certain Oscar-nominated peers, reminiscent of past conflicts in the industry. "I must confess, there was a scandal," he remarked, referring to the use of AI in fine-tuning Adrien Brody's accent. The director compared the situation to previous Hollywood controversies, noting, "This is just a part of moviemaking."

AI as a Natural Extension of Filmmaking Techniques

Drawing parallels with traditional film editing techniques, Cronenberg recalled how voices have been modified in films for decades. For example, he cited John Lone's performance in his 1993 film M. Butterfly, where voice pitch adjustments helped shape a character’s secret identity. According to him, using AI to perfect an accent is merely a modern evolution of this long-practiced art form.

Behind the Scenes of The Brutalist

Editor Dávid Jancsó further elaborated on the film’s production process. Utilizing AI tools provided by the Ukrainian company Respeecher, the team refined the Hungarian dialogue—one of the most challenging languages to master. Jancsó emphasized that AI facilitated minor adjustments due to budgetary and time constraints, not to overhaul the authenticity of the actors’ performances.

Brady Corbet, another key figure in the film, later clarified the process. Working alongside dialect coach Tanera Marshall for months, the actors delivered performances that were then delicately enhanced during post-production. The goal was straightforward: preserve the integrity of the performance while ensuring linguistic accuracy.

The Broader Implication for Filmmaking

This controversy brings to light a significant point: technology in film is not a replacement for talent and hard work, but a tool to help storytellers fully realize their vision. The debate underscores the importance of having an open, honest discussion about AI's role in the creative process—one that highlights its benefits rather than its potential drawbacks or misinterpretations.

Looking Ahead

As the film industry continues to evolve, the integration of AI in areas like sound editing will likely increase. Cronenberg’s stance encourages a reassessment of old prejudices, inviting filmmakers and audiences alike to view these advancements as natural extensions of creative expression rather than threats to authenticity.

Published At: March 24, 2025, 7:28 a.m.
Original Source: David Cronenberg Thinks ‘The Brutalist’s AI Controversy Was A Smear Campaign: “Just A Part Of Moviemaking” (Author: Glenn Garner)
Note: This publication was rewritten using AI. The content was based on the original source linked above.
← Back to News